[Missouri-l] Fwd: Alert! Sign-on: Federal Child Count Letter by Monday, April 27
Chip Hailey
chiphailey at cableone.net
Mon Apr 20 12:11:30 CDT 2009
>Delivered-To: chiphailey at cableone.net
>Subject: Alert! Sign-on: Federal Child Count Letter by Monday, April 27
>Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 11:06:30 -0600
>From: "Barbara Jackson LeMoine" <blemoine at afb.net>
>To: "Barbara Jackson LeMoine" <blemoine at afb.net>
>
>Alert! Sign-on: Federal Child Count Letter by Monday, April 27
>
>
>
>Consider signing-on either as an individual or on behalf of your organization
>
>
>
>During the recent Jo Taylor Conference held in
>Washington, DC, a small group of VI
>professionals discussed the issue of the
>inaccuracy of OSEP's child count with the staff
>of a number of Colorado Senators and
>Representatives. The Colorado delegation
>encouraged the VI professionals to draft a
>letter to Secretary Duncan, explaining the
>issue. They were also assured support from
>various members of Congress if experts in the VI
>field, particularly those at universities, would
>be willing to sign a letter to Secretary Duncan.
>
>Please take a few moments to read text of the
>letter that is included below in this e-mail
>message and consider signing-on either as an
>individual or on behalf of the agency you
>represent. The letter, addressed to Secretary
>Duncan, will be written on University of
>Northern Colorado (UNC) letterhead per the
>request of the Legislative Aide to Coloradoâs
>Jared Polis, a member of the House Committee on Education and Labor.
>
>
>
>If you wish to sign on to this effort, please
>e-mail <mailto:skelly at afb.net>skelly at afb.net
>indicating your support by first thing Monday, April 27.
>
>
>
>Text of Letter to Secretary Duncan
>
>
>
>April 13, 2009
>
>
>
>The Honorable Arne Duncan
>
>Secretary of Education
>
>U.S. Department of Education
>
>400 Maryland Avenue, SW
>
>Washington, D.C. 20202:
>
>
>
>Dear Mr. Secretary:
>
>
>
>We are writing to request your attention to a
>matter affecting students who are visually impaired or blind.
>
>
>
>The Federal Child Count, a statutory provision
>of the Individuals with Disabilities Education
>Act conducted by the Office of Special Education
>Programs (OSEP), renders a considerable number
>of students with educationally significant
>visual impairments systemically invisible.
>Because the count is based upon a primary
>disability category model, students who have
>disabilities in addition to a visual impairment
>are often not represented as having a visual
>impairment in OSEPâs annual report to Congress.
>
>
>
>Using other sources of information, such as the
>American Printing House for the Blind (APH), the
>magnitude of the issue is obvious. APH conducts
>an annual count of students who are legally
>blind. As such, the APH count is a more
>restrictive count then the OSEP count. Yet, the
>APH count consistently reports numbers that are
>more than twice that of the OSEP count. For
>example, in 2004, APH reported 56,700 students
>who were legally blind and receiving services,
>while the OSEP count reported there were only
>25,500 students who were visually impaired and receiving services.
>
>
>
>As informative as the APH count is, it is a very
>restrictive count as it includes only students
>who meet the legal definition of blindness. In a
>study based upon epidemiological estimates, the
>National Plan for Training Personnel to Serve
>Children with Blindness and Low Vision (NPTP),
>an OSEPâsponsored project, offered a more
>accurate picture of the numbers of students with
>educationally significant visual impairments by
>including those who had additional disability
>labels. This study, conducted in 1998, estimated
>there were approximately 93,500 students who
>were visually impaired, a figure almost four
>times greater than that of the OSEP count.
>
>NPTP recommended that OSEP implement a separate
>count of students with visual impairments, but that has not occurred.
>
>
>
>The impact of OSEPâs grossly inaccurate count
>has many negative and serious repercussions.
>Some of these repercussions include:
>
>
> * This disparity in numbers causes a bias in
> all research data on student needs and outcomes in this population;
> * The need for teachers certified in visual
> impairments, orientation and mobility
> specialists, and teachers for children who are
> deafblind is underestimated, impacting both
> teacher preparation programs and educational services;
> * Federal funding provided for vision
> services is insufficient to meet the need;
> * Children are not being appropriately
> served based upon educational needs.
>
> We request a set aside of 5 million dollars to
> develop and implement a yearly âNational
> Census of Students with Visual Impairmentsâ
> based upon the NPTP model. We believe that
> subsequent costs can be folded into current
> operating budgets, but the set aside is necessary to establish the system.
>
>
>
>Once accurate numbers are generated for this
>population of students, many of the impacts
>stated above can start to be addressed. It is
>our belief that once appropriate research can be
>conducted, appropriate numbers of professionals
>working with these students can be prepared and
>federal funding is aligned to meet the need,
>postâschool outcomes for students who are
>blind or visually impaired will mirror those of the nondisabled population.
>
>
>
>Thank you for your time and consideration in
>this matter. As you can see from the list of
>supporting institutions and organizations, this
>matter is of great importance to those who
>educate students who are visually impaired.
>Please do not hesitate to contact us if you need
>additional information or wish to discuss the matter further.
>
>
>
>Sincerely yours,
>
>
>
>=======================================
>Barbara Jackson LeMoine
>Policy Analyst
>American Foundation for the Blind
>Public Policy Center
>1660 L Street, N.W., Suite 513
>Washington, DC 20036
>202-822-0831
>E-mail: <mailto:blemoine at afb.net>blemoine at afb.net
>Web: <http://www.afb.org/gov.asp>http://www.afb.org/gov.asp
>Expanding possibilities for people with vision lossTM
>=======================================
>
>
>
More information about the Missouri-l
mailing list